Sears Tower to be renamed for new tenant

| Print | Reprints | Related Stories | Comments

(Crain’s) — Sears Tower will become Willis Tower.

The insurance broker announced Thursday morning that it will move to the Sears Tower and that the building will be renamed Willis Tower.

London-based Willis Group Holdings said it will consolidate five local offices into more than 140,000 square feet in the 110-story building at 233 S. Wacker Drive. Almost 500 employees will move into the building, Willis said.

Willis said the space is costing the company $14.50 a square foot and that it is not paying extra for the naming rights.

Related story: Sears Tower owners bristle at Willis release

Three years ago, when Sears Tower’s ownership group was looking to refinance the building, a representative compared the value of the naming rights to the building and its observation deck to stadium naming-rights deal, citing examples ranging with fees from $5.8 million to $10 million a year.

Related story: Willis could get Sears Tower naming rights

Willis is the largest new tenant to move into Sears Tower since the 2001 terrorist attacks. In recent years, the building has suffered several big tenant losses, including its largest tenant, by rental revenue, Ernst & Young U.S. LLP, which is moving in 2012 to an almost-complete skyscraper at 155 N. Wacker Drive.

“Having our name associated with Chicago’s most iconic structure underscores our commitment to this great city, and recognizes Chicago’s importance as a major financial hub and international business center,” Joseph J. Plumeri, chairman and CEO of Willis Group Holdings, said in a release. “We are delighted to be making this bold move and firmly establishing our leading presence in one of the nation’s biggest insurance markets, and it will be wonderful for all our associates to work under one roof.”

Willis currently has about 91,000 square feet in three downtown locations, according to real estate research firm CoStar Group Inc. The largest amount is about 42,000 square feet at 10 S. LaSalle St.

Offices in west suburban Oak Brook and Lombard also will be consolidated into the Sears Tower, Willis said. Willis expects to complete the move by late summer.

Willis is the world’s third-largest insurance brokerage, with brokerage revenue of $2.46 billion in 2007, according to Crain’s sister publication Business Insurance. Chicago-based Aon Corp. ranked second on BI’s 2008 list, with 2007 brokerage revenue of about $7.1 billion; Hilb ranked eighth, with brokerage revenue of about $780 million.

Willis renamed its North American business Willis HRH after its acquisition of Hilb for $2.1 billion, including assumed debt. The transaction increased Willis’s presence in the U.S. market but also increased its debt load at a time when insurance prices are softening, analysts say.

Willis was represented by real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield Inc.

NEW: We value your comments. Click here to learn more.

What do you think?

Readers now can comment on our stories. To comment, you must first be registered with ChicagoRealEstateDaily.com or ChicagoBusiness.com.

If you are already registered, log in now. Once you log in you will see a link labeled "Click here to continue." Click that link to return to the story and add your comment.

If you do not have an account, register now.

B D. wrote:
Whatchu talkin' bout Willis?
3/12/2009 9:20:43 AM
Recommend (3) Report Abuse
Catie W. wrote:
This is beyond stupid.
3/12/2009 9:25:26 AM
Recommend (2) Report Abuse
Shannon M. wrote:
April Fools? I certainly hope so. There's nothing worse to a Chicagoan than some 'out of town' company coming in and making significant changes to something sacred. And, justifying it by saying that it's a 'commitment to our great city' is even more insulting. Marshall Field's, anyone? Shame on you, Willis. Don't expect a warm welcome. This is a slap in the face.
3/12/2009 9:26:17 AM
Recommend (2) Report Abuse
Trevor A. wrote:
Wow, this is pathetic
3/12/2009 9:50:26 AM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
George L. wrote:
A London based company no one has ever heard of won't change what Chicagoans or most tourist's call the building. It will still be referred to as Sears Tower.

Of course, combining British and Freudian nomenclature, perhaps renaming it "Big Willie" might catch on a lot faster.

Willis Tower, indeed.
3/12/2009 9:52:34 AM
Recommend (5) Report Abuse
James L. wrote:
Shannon M. compares this to the conversion of Marshall Field's to Macy's. This is really not the same.

This is a name change, although a very big one at that. Still, people have gotten used to the Standard Oil/Amoco Building becoming Aon Tower.

The switch from Field's to Macy's was much more than a name change. In the case of Field's, the store was changed in the way it was run, the merchandise it offered and in its style--all in addition to name. On top of that, there's not much one can do to boycott Willis. Despite the fluff piece in today's Sun-Times, Macy's is getting killed in Chicago as a result of what they have done to Marshall Field's.

I hate it but I think we'll have to get used to this change as there is not much we can do about it. On the other hand, with all the continued protests against Macy's (see http://www.FieldsISChicago.org ) it seems the return of Field's is only a matter of time.
3/12/2009 10:16:40 AM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
Shannon M. wrote:
James L, maybe I wasn't very clear. My reference to Marshall Fields was because of the public backlash, not a comparison of the names changes themselves. Yes, you are right. Fundamentally, this is nothing like the Macy's acquisition of Marshall Fields. My point being that many Chicagoans don't take change lightly especially when it affects 'iconic' landmarks. Thanks for pointing out my lack of clarity. I hope I've made myself clear now.
3/12/2009 10:41:42 AM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
edward K. wrote:
US Cellular field WILL ALWAYS be Sox Park And Macy's WILL ALWAYS be Marshall Fields
and Willis Tower WILL ALWAYS be SEAR"S TOWER, No matter what a sign says.
Sear's Tower is not even getting any naming rights funds, They must really be DESPERATE for tenants, huh???
3/12/2009 11:36:54 AM
Recommend Report Abuse
Jon M. wrote:
Why all the hand wringing over a name change? Does changing the name change the skyline? Please tell me we won't have people calling for a boycott of the Willis Tower Observation Deck next year as we did when all the irrationals with nothing better to do were picketing the State Street Macy's a few years back.
News flash: Someday soon the Cubs are going to have to rebuild or seriously upgrade Wrigley Field, and when they do chances are the naming rights will be sold. What then? Oh my, what will we do?
Chicago is much more than the brand names associated with its landmarks. Until a company comes in and changes the name of the city itself I won't lose any sleep over it.
3/12/2009 12:14:41 PM
Recommend Report Abuse
James L. wrote:
Edwaard K. You may choose to still call the store at 111 N State St Marshall Field's but if you go inside you will find that the store's merchandise, style and customer service resembles little of Marshall Field's.

Thanks for the clarification, Shannon. Well done.
3/12/2009 1:26:58 PM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
Kimberly W. wrote:
If your from Chicago you are never going to call it that name it will always be "Sears Tower" till the day we die- that includes everything else they changed the names on, we will always refer to it by the original name- That's how you can tell your from "Chicago"!!!
3/12/2009 3:40:44 PM
Recommend (2) Report Abuse
Phil V. wrote:
Like death and taxes, I guess this is inevitable. Just for record, I haven't stepped into ANY Macy's store that was a Field's, Hudson's or an LS Ayres.
3/12/2009 3:47:38 PM
Recommend Report Abuse
Douglas E. wrote:
very sad and dark day for Chicago...
3/12/2009 4:50:12 PM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
Robert G. wrote:
How pathetic that we can not even keep a American owned company name on one of our own landmarks! i'm sure old Daly is making some hidden money off this deal some place!
3/12/2009 4:59:27 PM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
Rick D. wrote:
“Having our name associated with Chicago’s most iconic structure underscores our commitment to this great city..."

If they understood this city and its people they'd know the passion we have for icons such as the Sears Tower, and the idea of a name change would have never come up. I'm fairly certian that when the Hancock Building was sold keeping the name was a stipulation of the sale.
3/12/2009 6:02:58 PM
Recommend (1) Report Abuse
George S. wrote:
To anybody who changes the name of a Chicago icon: Deep down, you know it really isn't difficult to figure out. Nobody likes a stranger to come into one's house and suddenly rearrange things and expect its residents to give you a warm welcome. Change is inevitable; however, not all change is necessarily appropriate. It makes excellent business sense to be sensitive to your new hosts, not to mention is plain good manners. Far too many Chicagoans resent Macy's for changing the name of our iconic Marshal Field's.
3/13/2009 12:48:28 AM
Recommend Report Abuse
LoopNet Property Search